What the hell is going on with Philly schools?

Friends and neighbors,

To help us all understand what the hell is playing out right now in Philly schools, I wanted to start compiling a list of resources and articles about the Philadelphia School District's present situation and how it came about.  If you've got more to add (and  there WILL be a lot more being written about this subject in the days/weeks to come), please post them in the comments for others to read.

For those that haven't heard, on Tuesday, the mostly state-appointed School Reform Commission announced that because of a projected $218 million deficit, it was basically dismantling the Philadelphia School District.  The "plan" they announced involves closing 40 schools in 2013, and closing 6 additional schools each year until 2017.  Whatever is left will be divided up into "achievement networks" of around 25 schools. Managment over these networks of schools will be open to competition from public and private entities (including non-profits and for-profit corporations).

All this takes place about a decade after a Harrisburg-engineered takeover of the Philadelphia School District.  In 2001, the Philadelphia School District faced a $216 million deficit and growing public concerns that it was not effectively educating young people in this city.  At that time, the Republican controlled state government used this financial and internal crisis as a pretext for a radical experiment in school privatization.  The state invoked a recently passed law allowing for Harrisburg to seize control over the Philadelphia School District and appoint a School Reform Commision with broad authority to turn over the management of schools to corporations and non-profits.  Collective bargaining rights for teachers were curtailed as teacher strikes were made illegal.  At the time of the takeover, it appeared that the for-profit corporation Edison Schools would takeover the entire Philadelphia School District.  This didn't happen because people fought it and won.  Instead, the SRC pushed partial privatization through a "blended" model involving regular neighborhood schools, charters, and other school models administered by public and private entities.  

Now the same state-created SRC that was tasked with "saving" the district from ruin by bringing in outside managers and selling off schools to private captial has driven the district into a wall.  They've drafted a new agenda for radical privatization and austerity.  Corporations and politically connected non-profits stand to make a lot of money while students, families, and all city residents stand to suffer.

Let's read up quicks folks because things are about to get real here in Philly.  If we don't understand what's going on and raise a whole of lot of hell very quickly, we're going to lose more than we can possibly imagine.

(It's not letting me post multiple links in the main text, so check the comments for article links.)

26 Comments

History of the SRC

<p>Understanding the history of the state takeover is very valuable and important. Abolition of the SRC must be one of our demands because it is obvious it has been the method for this attack on public education. Some areas for investigation:</p> <p>1. The specifics of the state takeover should be studied. About 40 schools were to be turned over to Edison Schools. This was eventually scaled back to 8. These schools only lasted a few years. (I&#39;m not sure if Edison Schools even exists anymore.) Uncovering this history would be important to expose the bogus nature of the current priviatization and how it will unfold.</p> <p>2. The tenure of Arlene Ackerman must be investigated. It can be proved that she was on the board of the Broad Foundation while she was Superintendent of Schools. Who knew this and aided and abetted her wrecking operation? (Did Mayor Nutter know who she was working for?) She created the exact same controversies while Superintendent of San Francisco public schools as she did in Philadelphia. When they did a search for a Superintendent why was her tenure in San Francisco seen as a good thing?</p> <p>The Broad Foundation is one of the leading promoters of the priviitizing of public schools. They train prospective Superintendents (Arlene Ackerman was the first head of their Superintendents Academy before becoming Superintendent of Philadelphia Schools) to prepare public school systems for privitization. They use a method called &quot;churn&quot; which means whatever problems exist in a school district they make worse. This method explains much about Ackerman&#39;s administration.</p> <p>The $638 million deficit that the School District had this year was for two reasons. Governor Corbett cut funding for Philadelphia this year by $300 million. The other half of the defecit is from Ackerman. She threw money around like there was no tomorrow to start her Promise Academies and Renaissance Schools. Given the Broad Foundations methods it is highly likely that creating this defecit was deliberate as the way to advance their privitization agenda.</p> <p>For more information about the Broad Foundation, see the Parents Across America article &quot;How to tell if you School District is infected by the Broad virus&quot; at:</p> <p>http://parentsacrossamerica.org/2011/04/how-to-tell-if-your-school-district-is-infected-by-the-broad-virus/</p>
Jpiette's picture

Study: Dropout Rates for Blacks Higher in Charters

<p>Especially relevant here in Philly in light of the city&#39;s recent decision to dissolve the school board.</p> <p>http://urbanyouthjustice.visibli.com/share/hNKsDL</p> <p>Study: Dropout Rates for Blacks Higher in Charters - News - The Austin Chronicle<br /> urbanyouthjustice.visibli.com<br /> A new UT study shows black high school students in Texas are three times more likely to drop out from a charter system</p> <p>http://urbanyouthjustice.visibli.com/share/hNKsDL</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

Schoolhouse Democracy

<p>This plan is an absolute tragedy. &nbsp;But is there an opportunity here to push for workplace democracy in the schools? &nbsp;Suppose there were &#39;charter&#39; schools which are owned and operated by the teachers themselves. &nbsp;We know there is incredible corruption in the real-estate side of charter schools. &nbsp;Often would-be charter schools get to takeover existing schools or unused real-estate far below its market value. &nbsp;Can we leverage this fact to start worker-owned schools with limited startup costs? &nbsp;</p> <p>If Philadelphia&#39;s best teachers refuse to work in for-profit charters and instead work together to run schools in the interests of the workers, students and community perhaps the for-profit charters would fail.</p>